eNews!
News delievered to your inbox

Placebo effect may be at play in acupuncture studies: analysis

USER'S TOOLS

Email This Post Print This Post


Digg! Add to propeller Add to del.icio.us StumbleUpon
Add to Technorati Favorites Add this page to Mister Wong Add mobile feed

CM NEWS widget
Add to blog
or facebook

Reuters Health - Acupuncture can bring some relief to people with knee arthritis, but the benefits may be at least partly from a placebo effect, a new research review suggests.

In an analysis of 9 clinical trials from the past 15 years, researchers found that generally seemed to improve knee sufferers’ pain and stiffness in the short term. The patients had osteoarthritis, a degenerative joint disease associated with age, as opposed to associated with an autoimmune disorder.

However, a closer look showed that the benefits were limited to trials that compared with doing nothing or with “usual care,” such as anti-inflammatory medication.

In trials that compared with “sham” , on the other hand, there was no clear evidence that the real therapy was more effective.

Sham is accomplished by using non-penetrating needles, or inserting needles only into the superficial layer of skin, at random sites rather than the specific points used in real . In studies that evaluated electro-, the sham version involved phony electrodes and “mock” electrical stimulation of points.

The point is to keep study participants from knowing whether they were receiving the real or the placebo treatment. This helps separate the specific effects of a therapy from any placebo effects — where people feel better simply because they believe they’ve been treated.

The new findings suggest that the benefits of for knee are at least partly due to patients’ expectations, the study authors report in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

However, that doesn’t mean is not worthwhile, according to the researchers, led by Eric Manheimer of the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore.

Research does suggest that has a “genuine biological effect,” and there was evidence in some studies that the real therapy resulted in somewhat better short-term effects than sham , the researchers note.

For their study, Manheimer and his colleagues combined the results of nine clinical trials conducted in Europe, the U.S. and Thailand. The trials included a total of more than 3,500 subjects.

Each trial included a patient group that received for knee , as well as a “control” group. In some studies, control patients were placed on a waiting list for , while in others they received some standard therapy that patients did not. Control patients in other studies received sham .

In general, the Manheimer’s team found, only studies that pitted against doing nothing, or against standard care, showed clear benefits. The results of the sham-controlled trials were too mixed to show any benefits, according to the researchers.

The investigators do not, however, dismiss the potential benefits of for knee . Indeed, they note, a possible explanation for the mixed results is that sham had some actual biological effects.

Given the overall safety of , the researchers conclude, patients can still consider it as one option in a “multidisciplinary approach” to treating knee .

[Annals of Internal Medicine, June 19, 2007]

Tags: ,

Related posts



Comments

Got something to say?





Creative Commons License
Chinese Medicine News by Chinese Medicine News is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Canada License.
For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the licence terms originate from chinesemedicinenews.com.



Add CM NEWS to your GOOGLE web searches

And always get the most updated TCM news!





Add to Technorati Favorites Health Blogs - Blog Top Sites Chinalyst... The Hao Hao Report Powered by WordPress - WordPress Blogs Directory My Blog Directory Health